Reminiscent of The World Without Us |
Writers have not only to write compelling stories, but they
have the burden of accuracy. Even when writing a piece of historical fiction
like The Great Globe Itself, I needed
to know the facts before I could satirize them. Even when we are making things
up there can be a desire to fact-check, but fact-checking only goes so far.
When writing The Vampyres I invited an actual goth rock band to a table reading, and they
were entirely dismissive of the characters I had created. On the night in
question, a certain local professional cartoonist and non-professional social
critic also happened to be in attendance, and he thought their reaction was
hilarious. He said, “No, actually, guys like you are exactly like that.”
So, uh. So there.
Fortunately for theater artists, no one really writes about
our craft for popular media very much so there is little to be nitpick. One of the reasons the
Canadian TV program Slings and Arrows
is so popular among theater people is not for its accurate portrayal of “The
Life” but more because we’re all squeally like – “OMG, they’re talking about us!!!!!!’
Shortly after college my father recommended that I might be
interested in Light Thickens by Ngaio
Marsh, a mystery where the murder takes place during a production of Macbeth. At that point my professional
experience was not very deep, but I was immediately put-off by the director,
whose opening comments about each character, delivered to each actor sitting
around for the first read-through, were, I felt, horribly prescriptive. Add to that
several actors expressed their strong difference of opinion, right off the bat, and
engaged in a heated debate with the director, who insisted on the correctness of his
opinion.
Of course, there are directors who come forcefully at their company
like this, right at the start, though I am hard pressed to imagine the kind of
counter-argument emerging from the acting company in response, at least not at the
first blinking read-through. It just struck me as terribly false.
Let's read this corpse. |
Recently, my wife checked out Emily St. John Mandel’s recent
novel Station Eleven from the library, for us each to read. I had actually taken the book to North Carolina and
back but was absorbed in other reading and actually didn’t get to it until our
final night on the road, the night of the women’s final against Japan.
Looking into a vast, bright and shimmering television screen,
transmitting images of a game of football being played entirely by women nearly three thousand miles
away – the actual game itself attended by over fifty thousand people, an
unimaginable number to be all in one place – myself lying between clean sheets in a
hotel buzzing with people resting in safety and comfort, without weapons, twinkling
ice in my plastic cup, drinking impossibly sweet and cool soda pop, the room alive with electricity and light after
nightfall, the internet magically passing around us and through us, well-fed with warm pizza
and fresh, green salads brought right to our room first by way of a gasoline powered
vehicle and then the elevator. After a long day driving in a car, one cooled by
air that just poured out a vent in spite of the eighty plus degrees outside,
with clean water in a bottle, still cool, recently filled from a tap, available
to all, and watching an exciting game, I read one page of this new work and
promptly fell into a comfortable sleep, without care.
Read the book? You get it. Anyway.
This tale follows a caravan of actors and musicians, The
Traveling Symphony, who roam a post-apocalyptic wasteland, making their living
by playing and performing the works of Shakespeare.
They’re talking about
us!!!!!!
I was most tickled by the different philosophies expressed
by company members of the troupe, and how even after the end of everything
actors and artists will be having the exact same debates about Shakespeare.
One player is confident in the idea that Shakespeare transcends time, and that more recent scripts are ground deep in a past that make them no longer comprehensible - let alone relevant - and that their decision to perform only his works, to the exclusion of all other texts, is the best artistic decision to make.
One player is confident in the idea that Shakespeare transcends time, and that more recent scripts are ground deep in a past that make them no longer comprehensible - let alone relevant - and that their decision to perform only his works, to the exclusion of all other texts, is the best artistic decision to make.
Another artist privately believes quite the opposite, that
the works of Shakespeare are far too limited in their scope of human experience
and besides she hates Shakespeare but will keep her opinion to herself because
(ta-da) she works for a Shakespearean theater company.
There is also that age-old debate regarding costumes. Shouldn't
the actors dress as their audiences do, in the decades-old, well-worn everyday wear
of the past century? The thinking goes that if you perform Shakespeare’s text
in contemporary dress, you bring the work closer to your audience. I have heard this argument. I have made this argument.
Other characters believe theater is a unique occasion, an opportunity to be transported to a different time and place, to see something special. As such, when the opportunity presents itself to ransack a long-abandoned home or school, to forage for any useful supplies, a useless dress or a disregarded men’s suit – unnecessary for survival – is to them a valuable treasure.
Other characters believe theater is a unique occasion, an opportunity to be transported to a different time and place, to see something special. As such, when the opportunity presents itself to ransack a long-abandoned home or school, to forage for any useful supplies, a useless dress or a disregarded men’s suit – unnecessary for survival – is to them a valuable treasure.
John Wood, Alex Kingston RSC 1990 |
I was shocked just to read it. I mean, uh, spoiler alert, Cordelia
dies at the end of King Lear. Most
know this and if you didn’t, well, so does Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, Timon of Athens, Hamlet
(and practically everyone he touches) as well as Julius Caesar, they all die. Caesar doesn't even wait to the end, he dies in the third
act.
But which fictional marketing director gave the green light to putting
that image on the poster? Your main promotional image is the great tragedy at
the very end of the play?
As our marketing department at Great Lakes has been conceiving of the season image for our Fall 2015 production, I have had the opportunity to take in dozens of other images from professional productions dating back a few decades.
Most are a dark, static depiction of an old man. I saw John Wood play Lear in 1990, the graphic was of the king prancing in madness, with a laurel of flowers on his head. A few include the Fool. Others are abstract; when we saw Ian Holm play the role in 1997 the image was of an eclipse of the sun.
As our marketing department at Great Lakes has been conceiving of the season image for our Fall 2015 production, I have had the opportunity to take in dozens of other images from professional productions dating back a few decades.
Most are a dark, static depiction of an old man. I saw John Wood play Lear in 1990, the graphic was of the king prancing in madness, with a laurel of flowers on his head. A few include the Fool. Others are abstract; when we saw Ian Holm play the role in 1997 the image was of an eclipse of the sun.
The GLT season image for King Lear will not be released for
a month or so, but they did principal photography last week. Here is an intriguing preview:
Via Facebook. What will happen? |
No comments:
Post a Comment