Showing posts with label Magnolia (film). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magnolia (film). Show all posts

Friday, April 25, 2025

Magnolia (film)

 
While I was recuperating from eye surgery, a friend offered to bring dinner and suggested we watch a “comfort movie” which was a wild concept because while I understand that other people have their comfort movies (our eldest, for example, relies upon Moana) I usually spend movie time finding something new, something I have never seen before.

This is not to say I don’t watch movies more than once, of course I do. I think I saw Ghostbusters in the theater around ten times. I have a DVD collection, not a large one, but it includes many discs I buy just in case – just in case I have the opportunity to share them with someone else. Not to sit and watch them on my own.

So, what title? What movie? I chose Paul Thomas Anderson’s L.A. epic Magnolia. Hadn’t watched that in maybe fifteen, twenty years. I first saw this movie in early January 2000, when it was in general release. I saw it with both of my brothers, which was a rare treat. But we’re all movie guys with opinions, and at one point in the film, I had a startling moment of self-awareness.

"This is something that happens."
The film has great momentum, after an extended narrated introduction on the nature of coincidence and the importance of storytelling, the plot whipsaws from one storyline to another, which are at first seemingly unrelated but are soon found to intertwine.

About half way through I thought, “Oh, no. I’m loving this, but we’re having dinner after – what if my brothers hate it?” Long story short, we were all impressed.

Sharing it with my friend, someone much younger than I, in 2022, was another revelation. I know what it’s about, it’s about fathers, the sins of the fathers, about toxic masculinity in general. That is the central theme, and one which resonated more deeply with me now that I am a father myself. I’m not sure what my young colleague thought. I find that many young people prefer not to engage with such issues, not as entertainment. Horror films, sure, but not dramas which depict ordinary men doing everyday, terrible things.

Moving forward a few years, I have also now shared Magnolia with our son. We watch movies together, he knows it’s important to me. And while he did enjoy the film, he wasn’t so sure about the song.

Yes! The song. About two-thirds of the way through this three hour movie, when every major plot thread has risen to a point of no return, and every character is at their most isolated (two of them are actually on the verge of death) the song “Wise Up” by Aimee Mann begins, and every character sings along. There is no explanation for this moment, it simply happens. The entire song plays, and everyone takes a lyric.



This comes right after hospice nurse Phil Parma (Philip Seymour Hoffman) administers a coma-inducing level of pain reliever to his charge Earl Partridge (Jason Robards), a moment which hits differently once you have also made a like decision for one of your parents.

The song was always controversial. Janet Maslin, for example, writing for the New York Times, found it to be a horrible mistake. “It's astonishing to see a film begin this brilliantly only to torpedo itself in its final hour.” This is a widely held opinion, though I naturally disagree. For me, it is space to breathe, to sit with the characters for a moment before we charge into the rest of the narrative, which is about to go absolutely batshit.

Melora Walters in "Magnolia"
Also, I like singing. I like songs in movies, I like songs in plays. I once directed Shakespeare’s Henry VIII, in which the discarded and despondent Queen Katherine says, “My soul grows sad with troubles,” and urges her bard to: “Sing, and disperse 'em, if thou canst.” In this modern dress production, her assistants perform a karaoke version of “Somebody That I Used to Know.” There were some giggles from the crowd at first, which were dispelled when they realized, “Oh, my God … are they going to sing the entire thing?”

Of course we were. Why wouldn’t we?

My new play, The Right Room, is about four couples, in four different Midwestern hotel rooms, in four different years during the 20th century. The action plays concurrently, in the same room, each couple unaware of the others. Except when they break into song two-thirds of the way through. Did I steal this idea from Magnolia? Of course I did. I also stole it from Caryl Churchill’s Cloud 9. I steal from all sorts of places, because I am a genius.

What song, you might ask? The classic "If You Were a Train" by Buddy Langston. From Wikipedia:
Buddy Langston, a soulful saxophonist, rose to fame in 1930s Kansas City, blending blues and swing into electric late-night sets. A self-taught prodigy, his smoky solos enchanted crowds at the 12th Street Reno Club. Langston's bold improvisations influenced generations, securing his legacy as a cornerstone of early American jazz history.*


Why a song, you might ask? From my stage directions:
The song is an opportunity for choreography through which characters who do not otherwise speak to each due to the limitations of time and space to engage.
Will it work, you might ask? Well. Maybe this summer I will have the chance to find out.

Source:
"Entangled Lives on the Cusp of the Millennium" by Janet Maslin, The New York Times (12/17/1999)
Wikipedia: Buddy Langston

Monday, February 10, 2025

Henderson's Relish (condiment)

Henderson’s Relish is a condiment produced in and largely consumed in that part of South Yorkshire they call Sheffield. Not trying to start a fight with any native Sheffielders but this Midwest American would absolutely, in an attempt to easily communicate its flavor, compare it to Lea and Perrins Worcestershire sauce.

However, unlike that unctuous seasoning, Henderson’s does not include anchovies, so not only is it gluten free, it is also a vegan condiment.

The musical Standing at the Sky’s Edge is set in Sheffield, and includes a scene in which several folks in one apartment in the Park Hill estate partake of and comment upon a bottle of Henderson’s. It’s a reference which amused the West End audience I was a part of, which suggested to me it was a local delicacy, but known enough to humor the rest of the country.

Thing is, though, the scene in which the same bottle is commented upon, it is in fact being passed around by three parties who are unaware the others are there. It is mocked at a party in the 2010s, received with minor disgust by recently arrived Liberian refugees in the 1980s, and liberally splashed onto dinner by a miner in the 1960s.

Last week, I was having coffee with someone I hadn’t seen in some time. They asked me what I was working on and when I told them it was about three generations of my family, all taking place at the same time in one hotel room, he asked me if I had seen the movie, Here.

I said I had not, but that was familiar with the graphic novel. And he’s not wrong, because I do believe McGuire’s original version for that was printed RAW (see Here: graphic novel) had a profound effect which stayed with me. But he also could have said it reminded him of Standing at the Sky’s Edge.

Here’s the thing, I am going to be transparent about this – which is odd, because I don’t generally like to talk about the writing while it’s happening, before it’s produced, and I'll tell you why. On more than one occasion I have had conversations with critics and found my words used against me in their write-ups, and that's irritating, you know?

So, what I am currently working on is actually a play my mom wanted me to write years ago. She found my grandparents’ love letters from the early 1930s, and thought they were lovely and that there might be a play there. And they are lovely, but I found no obvious plot.

They were source material, however, for a paper I wrote in pursuit of my MFA a few years back, after she passed, and I began investigating my ancestry in earnest. And that paper led to an actual play script, one which took place in four different hotel rooms in four different years.

It may have been the comic strip that inspired the scenes running concurrently, and maybe it was the musical I had recently seen. There’s a song in my new script, too, an idea which I may have intentionally or otherwise stolen from Cloud Nine or maybe the film Magnolia. All I know is that I needed a song there.

Anyway, I recently ordered a four pack of Henderson’s Relish. It was a lot cheaper to get the four pack, and I did wonder how long the other bottles would be sitting on the shelf, but we’re almost done with the first one. I put Hendo’s on everything.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Henry VIII: Pageantry

I love to sing-a.
And the moon-a and the June-a and the Spring-a

This afternoon I had a conversation with a reporter for the Sun News about the production. And I found the play is not difficult to talk about, it's actually pretty straightforward. You just have to make sure the subject stays on what the play is, and not so much about what it isn't.

When I first agreed to the production, I assumed there would be "pageantry" though I could not imagine what shape that might take. The more we commit to the contemporary look and feel of the production, the more any kind of classical pageantry, with formal dancing and choral odes would seem awkward. If we cannot find a modern way of presenting any aspect of the production, it just won't fit.

And so the party is an office party, crashed by the King and a few of "his guys" dressed not as masquers, but in a disguise which is at once contemporary and a little obnoxious, in the effort to bring life to the party.

Think Prince Harry coming to a costume party dressed as a Nazi, or Ted Danson in blackface. I mean ... we aren't doing that. Only something kind of like that.

Later, during the midst of divorce proceedings, the Queens requests a song to cheer her mood. This would be an odd request for someone to make at the office, but one of her people makes it work. And others join in. It's like that scene in Magnolia. Only different.

Yesterday we worked the song, just me, four actors and Rachel, the stage manager, talking through, singing through, and working through the song, with lyrics and without, stopping and going as necessary. Great progress had been made by the end of two hours, and we will revisit the piece on Tuesday.

The wife has forbidden me from ever again using the term "sausage fest".

Laura, our Katharine, recently joined the company in rehearsal. For two weeks we have been working non-Katharine scenes, establishing mood and attitude. Moving into the scenes with Katharine, it was stunning to me how different her character is from the rest. More conciliatory, open to compromise, calling things as they are, devoid of ulterior motive. Neither scheming nor clueless.

Two weeks in a hall of boys gave me insight as to why dudes like to direct Mamet. I am not saying I would, Mamet is a myopic bucket of shit. But I understand how one could.